(post deleted by author)
Curious question, how old are you ![]()
This. People should stop caring about violence in a literal videogame, it’s fictional and the more options, the more stories we can have in the game. Put that energy into real life violence where it actually harms real people instead.
The devs could make a setting or dlc for people who want more mature content in the game and can download it seperately so people have no reason to complain about existing or non-existing features cause both would exist
Honestly, I don’t see anything wrong with this animation. And I think it’s a bit of an exaggeration. And in general, it sometimes scares me how seriously people take imaginary people in games…
I don’t think it’s an exaggeration, since it’s not possible to hurt children in other games either (unless they’re 18+ or censored games).
So I think the majority is against seeing child abuse in games.
And I think Krafton should have respect for players that don’t want to experience this.
Most life simulation players play with families and asked so often for more interactions with babies, toddlers and children.
They certainly hadn’t an interaction in mind where a baby gets hit with the fist on its head.
And it’s not only a ten year old girl hitting her little baby brother, it’s the adult player who is actively initiating violence against a help-and defenseless baby sitting on the floor.
In World of Warcraft it’s not even possible to send child charcters into pet battles.
(post deleted by author)
It’s not a hit as others say and it’s just a videogame, this is not real life. What a adult person does in a videogame does not reflect their behaviour or personality in real life. Let people tell the kind of story they want, it’s a single player game after all. And adult zois can’t even “hit” the baby. I agree with the theboynub who said that younger siblings explore and do this things cause they are curious. It gives personality and depth, it shows that kids have more than one side (which is realistic). And what lissahl said.
Imo they can add even more of this kinda things where children actually fight each other because they are children. Not everyone want a game where everything is perfect like in sims 4. We want a realistic life sim with every aspect of life, which includes “negative” things. And this thing is pretty minor imo
Also I think you are kinda “rude”? to say “a adult player chooses this!!”, as if adults wouldn’t be allowed to do whatever they want in their own game? Like, you’re blaming adults for picking a negative interaction. And it’s not even a violent abusive hit so all the things you claim why it would be problematic don’t apply in this case because that interaction is not what you portray it to be. (Talking about abusive behaviour when in reality it’s a interaction between two kids)
I hope my post is understandable, I’m not native
For this reason I would say the game needs a morality check…
- There’s nothing explicit about a towel, the only things that should always be censored is actually nude child and teenage Zois. I can understand no nude adults being uncensored though.
- To me, even though it’s wrong, a child hitting a baby should be treated as not severe. I would prefer that the parent Zoi, if autonomous, would autonomously handle it to show that it is wrong, but it is a fact of life that children fight with each other because they don’t know better.
- Adult Zoos should NOT be able to hit child Zois, that is not the same thing. I would even go so far as to not allow Zois whose age has been tampered with in any way (even with legit means like the checkbox or with Meow store stuff) to continue to be allowed to hurt “other children” in such fights by tracking the “true age” of a Zoi in the background.
As the inZoi fandoms’ self-proclaimed Kidult advocate, I stand in these positions on the matter and do so not out of preference or public appearances, but because I have thought about the matter already in other contexts and I recognize when an action is immoral. It would be immoral to lie by portraying kids as incapable of making mistakes, but it would also be immoral for any adult to hit a child, especially out of anger. Even spanking, assuming it would even work (it’s controversial, to say the least, don’t enable it in inZoi) should only be done in the most serious of cases (such as a truly selfish, spoiled brat who has endangered another kid by their actions) using minimal force applied with bare hands and with privacy from other children. Most importantly, in this case it’s a baby. A baby isn’t a functional adult or even more than what we could call “human larva” to explain it loosely, or in other words a baby needs things and parents are obligated to provide them as best they can. Would a bee expect a larva to harvest nectar and defend the hive? No. Why expect a baby to respond in any positive way to being hit? The baby can’t understand why it was hit, all you’d do is hurt an innocent infant.
So yeah, I hope the devs realize this about child care. Even by the most generic, standardized, sanitized, boilerplate descriptions, hitting children causes lifelong trauma.
i think we can all agree that kids can hurt other kids (as thats something a lot of kids and especially siblings do) while adult zois can only hurt zois in the same or similar age range
I think we should agree that everyone is allowed to have their own opinion and that we can agree to disagree.
I think the damn censorship AI has pissed me off.
Edit: This came out wrong, I don’t want to swear at you. The AI is being weird and denying me from properly explaining my rationale for my opinions in my first post in this topic.
I’ve already participated in the discussion on Discord, so I’ll be brief. I’m not voting on the poll because I don’t think the questions reflect the animation in question.
Do I like seeing violence against children in video games? No, in fact, I don’t like seeing violence in general. But I think it’s really excessive to classify this act as “violence.”
Personally, I’d prefer Inzoi to be rated 16+ if it’s meant to be realistic.

